New #'s for me 393/733.
KTA wrote:Wow a 7% correction factor is pretty healthy. Why is it soo lazy? What are you running for a turbo?
KTA wrote:The correction factor added 7% to what your truck actually made that day in that location. Correction factors are designed for naturaly aspirated cars and are intended to make numbers from diffrent places compareable. Usually if the correction factor is more than 4% then it must be at high altitude, and that correction factor is bogus on a turbo engine because they don't lose as much power at altitude as a naturaly aspirated motor does. As for the lazy the only thing I can think of was how were they measuring rpms?
PToombs wrote:Rich, that's pretty good! Now put a 366 in it, bump the timing and do it again.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 95 guests