Torque Converters.... which one.

How they work, how they don't work, and how to fix them

Moderators: Greenleaf, BC847, Richie O

Torque Converters.... which one.

Postby 2muchtq » Sun Nov 18, 2007 9:47 pm

I am getting the parts together to follow BC's thread on reBUILDING my tranny. I have a buildable core that I am going to take my time on... so doing it right wont step aside due to me needing my truck running.

I have a quesiton on converters. I can get a Dunrite for a deal.

I have NO experience with these converters for the first gen. I know the Dunrite builds that Rip does holds PLENTY of power... I am just curious if anyone knows how 'tight' these converters are.

I have owned an 89% DTT and it was plenty loose to spool at the line. But this was a lockup converter (95RH tranny)

Unk has a 91% in his full DTT and I LOVE the way it works... just do not want to spend the coin on a 91DTT converter.

So... long winded post aside. Anyone have experience with different converters?

Anyone running a converter that they would reccomend for 400+ HP?


Thanks everyone
Mark
2muchtq
fuel screw!!!!
 
Posts: 89
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 6:34 pm
Location: Springfield, OR

Postby JD730 » Mon Nov 19, 2007 5:18 am

I have a Goerend 3 disc. Thats the only one I've ever run so I don't have anything to compare to.

If you want to put power down I would look for a lockup style core to rebuild. No matter how tight you make the fluid coupling its still not 100%.
Mike
Thats not a leak, its the external lubrication system.
The "Rattle Box"
93 W250 Silver Club Cab, few tweaks here and there.
John Deere Two Cylinders, too many to list.
JD730
fuel screw!!!!
 
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 10:27 am
Location: Belvidere, NJ

Postby BC847 » Wed Nov 21, 2007 12:27 am

I think you'll find most if not all the major converter re-builders have stopped marketing the commonly named 89% and 91%. Reason being, too many problems with customers expecting "Better" performance. Most of which have no idea of how what goes into the converter (HP/torque/RPM) dictates what comes out. Certainly with the rotating and stationary components in closer relation, more apparent power is transmitted.

As such, most now market a single modified version. When asked how tight in the common %, most will balk rightfully thinking "Aw Jeez! Not again!!"

Still though most builders can custom set one to your liking allowing time for the work. Else, it's usually an off-the-shelf swap for your core.

I went with SunCoast hoping there's something to the reliability of the brand. Further, that they offer has the billet backplate (that which mates to the flex-plate). The idea being to help further reduce flexing.

Image



I think DunRight is relatively new in terms of a reputable/established converter vendor. I'm seeing more and more references to them.

Considering it's all the same converter cores that they all work with, it's a matter of how well the machine work is done in tightening them up. General "Good workmanship" practices being foremost.

We'll see.

Hope this helps. ;)


(Work with me, I'm on muscle relaxers & pain meds due to a recent back injury). Image
David

1993 12mm VE Fueled W250 CC, Green
12.67 @ 103.35
Your basic farm truck ;)
BC847
Administrator
 
Posts: 2203
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 5:22 pm
Top

Postby JD730 » Wed Nov 21, 2007 4:59 am

BC847 wrote:I think DunRight is relatively new in terms of a reputable/established converter vendor. I'm seeing more and more references to them.

Dave,
Dunrite has been in the trans/converter business for years. For reasons that are unknown to me it seems they've been sitting on the back burner for years.
Mike
Thats not a leak, its the external lubrication system.
The "Rattle Box"
93 W250 Silver Club Cab, few tweaks here and there.
John Deere Two Cylinders, too many to list.
JD730
fuel screw!!!!
 
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 10:27 am
Location: Belvidere, NJ
Top


Return to Transmission

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests