I have a nv4500 with an advance adapters Bellhousing on my 91 and I've gotta replace my slave cylinder.
Anyone know if the 2nd gen slave cylinders set-ups are better then the 1s gens?
What's better 2nd gen Slave or 1st gen
Moderators: Greenleaf, BC847, Richie O
2 posts
• Page 1 of 1
What's better 2nd gen Slave or 1st gen
by Collers9640 » Thu Mar 31, 2016 2:00 pm
77’ W200 Cummins- Auto, BHAF, 4” Exhaust
91.5 W250 Cummins Conversion- PS I/C, pump maxed, Red Oak Diesel Injectors, Coolertubz, pump advanced 1/8", 3" elbow, 3200 Spring, Piston Lift Pump, KDP fixed, DennyT pin, HX35, 4in Downpipe, BHAF, Heater Grid Delete, Alcan springs, Bilstein Shocks
1984 D350 Crew Cab (Future Cummins Project)
91.5 W250 Cummins Conversion- PS I/C, pump maxed, Red Oak Diesel Injectors, Coolertubz, pump advanced 1/8", 3" elbow, 3200 Spring, Piston Lift Pump, KDP fixed, DennyT pin, HX35, 4in Downpipe, BHAF, Heater Grid Delete, Alcan springs, Bilstein Shocks
1984 D350 Crew Cab (Future Cummins Project)
- Collers9640
- fuel screw!!!!
- Posts: 171
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 4:25 pm
- Location: Charleston SC
Re: What's better 2nd gen Slave or 1st gen
by Philip » Thu Mar 31, 2016 8:26 pm
Slave cylinders are the same casting numbers and bore size all the way into the 3rd gen series trucks. The only difference is the later 6 spd's use a longer push rod.
93 W350 Club/cab w/duals, buckets & console, B&W flatbed, G56, 6 spd, 3:07 rears, gages, HX40/16, 4" exhaust, 6X.018 sticks, rear air ride suspension
-
Philip - 14mm rotor
- Posts: 1954
- Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:50 am
- Location: Indiana