Moderators: Greenleaf, KTA, BC847, Richie O
IowaCummins wrote:Can you guess what finger I am holding up for you?
GLHS wrote:I see lot's of 5 and 7 hole talk, why not talk about 6 holers?
oldestof11 wrote:To clarify Weston, I wasn't being smart.
I was wanting to know how you would back that up.
chrislib wrote:These new injectors raise a few questions to some "truths" I have held regarding PODs, and these new injctors seem to contradict what I had *thought* was the gospel regarding injector design. We all know PODs haze, it is the ONE thing I could`nt stand about them. I can deal with heavy-ish WOT smoke and EGT`s,running my IP harder than need be due to the pop being too high (and the resultant IP noise and engine clatter from all the damn timing PODs seem to want) but haze?...hate it, really really bad. That said, I had always thought the main reason PODs haze so bad is due to the SAC design tip, something to the effect that the sac holds fuel that does`nt completely burn and thus you get haze. If thats so, then why do these injectors NOT haze...at all? AND if the SAC design is responsible for haze, why did 3rd gens go BACK to a SAC tip?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 61 guests