Heo wrote:Sure, biodiesel may be hard on certain plastics and rubbers, ...
To exactly what plastics and rubbers do you refer, Nitrile, Viton, Buna, what exactly? Poor factless people like me want to know!
Heo wrote:The 5.9 Liter was not designed to run on oil. Just because it does run on WVO or WMO does not mean that some harm isnt being inflicted.
I've been running WMO in my 1st Gen for over three years, and a commonrail for almost one year now. They both run better than they did the day I purchased them. Far better. Quieter, more power and better fuel mileage. Well at least before I put the big tires on the 1st Gen. Do you have any of your own personal experience with which to enlighten us?
Heo wrote:The motor oil itself was designed to inhibit combustion, then pared with the metals and other crap floating around, leads to a deadly combo.
Cummins authorizes up to 5% WMO fuel add and even sells kits to automatically remove, mix/fuel and replentish oil in the crankcase. I suppose the manufacturer is not aware of this dangerous condition of which you speak.
Heo wrote:I have a neat science experiment you can try at home,...
I have a science experiment you can try up your arse. Study the cetane requirements for diesel combustion at various temperatures and get back to me on that.
Heo wrote:I don't understand the excitement in using WVO and especially WMO as a fuel, it is just because it's low hanging fruit?
I use it for lubricity and cetane stability. ULSD generally runs an HFRR rating around 700, requiring a lubricity additive. I'm not trusting the oil companies to take care of that for me. I spend a certain amount of time managing my fuel add mixes, filtering equiment and stock of WMO and used petroleum products of all kinds which I burn in the truck, so it's not exactly "low hanging fruit" to me, per se.
Let me know if you need any more "facts."
