Some Help With Injectors

How to make it go fast

Moderators: Greenleaf, KTA, BC847, Richie O

Some Help With Injectors

Postby RSWORDS » Tue Nov 24, 2009 3:35 pm

Hey guys, over on Diesel Bombers we are haveing an disscussion about 1st gen injectors and sizes.



This post was put up buy Smokem (Weston) he makes some really good injectors for 2nd gen truck and SWEARS that 6 holes are a waste of time on 1st gen trucks. here is his post

Look at it this way, Bosch quit using the 6-hole design in '94, even though the angle of the jet did not change. There are a few reasons, the technical term is known as low lift needle deviation. Basically, when the valve opens the needle is side-loaded which causes 3 holes to fire, and 3 holes do not. Also, the 5-hole design suits the offset incline pattern found on the 12v injector/combination. Hole size does not seem to be as important on the VE equipped engines, I believe soley due to lack of fuel quantity


Can some of you that are smarter about injector tech tell me if you agree or risagree with that statment...
Image
User avatar
RSWORDS
14mm rotor
 
Posts: 820
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:00 pm

Postby bgilbert » Tue Nov 24, 2009 3:52 pm

How many 1st gen high horsepower customers has he built injectors for? You never know, he maybe right. Since I'm using a 6 hole nozzle with a piston that was designed for a 4 hole nozzle. The recipe for 500+hp is out there for a 1st gen though. All these guys trying to reinvent the wheel and haven't even broken 350rwhp :roll: :lol: :lol: . As kta used to say, try it and report back to us ;) .
Bill Gilbert
85 D350 crew with 90 6BT intercooled Getrag 3.07's
93 D350 single cab Getrag 3.54's.
bgilbert
14mm rotor
 
Posts: 2253
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 5:04 pm
Location: Terre Haute, Indiana

Postby Richie O » Tue Nov 24, 2009 6:28 pm

I don't know spit about injectors and I admit it. One thing I did catch was he said the angle did not change in 94. I read all the time that the the spray angle is different in 94 and up compared to ours. Whats the deal??
1989 W250 727, 3.07 L/S, S300, P/S Intercooler, Stans exaust, Pump adjustments, 127k miles,297 hp
1993 W250 extended cab, rag, 4.10 l/s, 6x16's, HTT 62/71/14 piston l/p, Isspro EV series tach, fuel pressure, boost, oil pres, water temp, volt, pryo, 132k/ 301 hp
1992 W250 with NV4500, 3.54's, 16cm 60mm GDS H1C, ground stock cone, Isspro tach, pryo, boost, fuel pressure, slow, rusty, dented,180k
User avatar
Richie O
Administrator
 
Posts: 4171
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 9:01 pm
Location: New England
Top

Postby RSWORDS » Tue Nov 24, 2009 7:07 pm

I'm not sure,
Image
User avatar
RSWORDS
14mm rotor
 
Posts: 820
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 8:00 pm
Top

Postby ford69557ci » Tue Nov 24, 2009 8:51 pm

Yes the spray angle is different between a p pump and ve engine. Lack of fuel quantity? I think there are some ve pumps out there movin a decent amount of fuel these days. I dont know if it was the size of the holes or the amount of holes, but my 6x18's sure made more power than my 435's. On a lower flow lower pop pressure pump a 6 hole stick will burn cleaner than a 5 hole stick of the same flow rate.
92 w250, NV4500, D80, maxed pump, AFC gone, extended fuel screw, more to come.
User avatar
ford69557ci
14mm rotor
 
Posts: 897
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 4:36 pm
Top

Postby Richie O » Tue Nov 24, 2009 8:55 pm

As I say, I don't know. I wish I had more knowledge of this stuff. I love reading but when you read something that is wrong and repeat it it snowballs. I did put fuel in my truck today all by myself. :D
1989 W250 727, 3.07 L/S, S300, P/S Intercooler, Stans exaust, Pump adjustments, 127k miles,297 hp
1993 W250 extended cab, rag, 4.10 l/s, 6x16's, HTT 62/71/14 piston l/p, Isspro EV series tach, fuel pressure, boost, oil pres, water temp, volt, pryo, 132k/ 301 hp
1992 W250 with NV4500, 3.54's, 16cm 60mm GDS H1C, ground stock cone, Isspro tach, pryo, boost, fuel pressure, slow, rusty, dented,180k
User avatar
Richie O
Administrator
 
Posts: 4171
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 9:01 pm
Location: New England
Top

Postby ford69557ci » Tue Nov 24, 2009 10:17 pm

I do believe my factory non IC sticks were 4 hole, I have never pulled the ones on an IC 1st gen, but I am pretty sure they are not 6 hole?? So where is he gettin that cummins stopped using 6 hole injectors in 94?
92 w250, NV4500, D80, maxed pump, AFC gone, extended fuel screw, more to come.
User avatar
ford69557ci
14mm rotor
 
Posts: 897
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 4:36 pm
Top

Postby Mark Nixon » Tue Nov 24, 2009 10:36 pm

Richie O wrote:....I did put fuel in my truck today all by myself. :D

ROFLMFFAO!!! :lol:
Fortunately you live in a state where it's legal to handle a hose nozzle, you could have even been doing THAT wrong in Oregon!

Good job, Richie!

Mark.
Mark Nixon
 
Top

Postby peobryant » Wed Nov 25, 2009 12:21 am

I though the spray angle on the I/C trucks and P-Pumped trucks were the same? Ours our 145* while the Non I/C trucks are 155*. That's what I've read anyways.

The Non I/C trucks ran 4X.012 injectors, the I/C trucks ran 6X.009 injectors and the 2nd Gens use a 5 hole injector.
Parker
1991 Dodge Ram D350, Cummins Turbo Diesel, A518
1972 Mercedes-Benz 220D, OM615 Diesel, 4 Speed Manual
User avatar
peobryant
14mm rotor
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:07 am
Location: Goshen, Ky
Top

Postby diesel freak01 » Wed Nov 25, 2009 5:35 am

im not any kind of an injector man but i will say that i have read ppl taking nozzles from 2nd gens and putting on 1st gen bodies so that tells me that the angle is the same or relativly the same. i thought the ic injectors were a 5x9? i think you guys are right about the 4x12.
1993 d350 ctd drw 2wd auto
diesel freak01
fuel screw!!!!
 
Posts: 456
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 7:30 am
Location: mcarthur ohio
Top

Weston

Postby ZSkibo » Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:43 am

Seem like he knows what he's doing. I will report what I see from my 5x18's he's building for me now. Should have them in before the end of DEC.
92 W250 Pump bombed, AFC out, 366 spring, 18* timing, KSB hotwired, HX35 12cm non wg, New Era 6x18's, BHAF, 60 lb in/ex springs, 4" PAC Brake, onboard air, Nathan P3 horns
ZSkibo
fuel screw!!!!
 
Posts: 80
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 9:44 am
Location: Unionville, PA
Top

Postby KTA » Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:17 pm

P-pumps run higher injection pressures and rates than a VE. Cummins went from a 4x.012 to a 6x.009 to reduce emissions while making the same power. It costs more to make a 6 hole than a 5, and thanks to higher pressure fewer holes is needed so they switched to a 5 hole for the p-pumps. There are many factors that go into optimum hole size, spray angle, and hole number. These factors are fuel quantitiy, injection time, injection rate, swirl, combustion chamber design, atomization, fuel viscosity, charge density, and a few others.
Fleet of Junk: 1989 D350 627rwhp 1300 tq B-1/Hx60 twins, KTA pump/injectors, ported head, BIG fuel supply. 13.75@ 109.5mph 1/4: 1992 W350 Cab-chasis, 1993 W350 ext cab cust.370 inj Hx40/16cm 290rwhp hydroboost brakes,1984 D350 crew-cab another project.
User avatar
KTA
diesel guru/mod
 
Posts: 1855
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 2:23 pm
Location: Shelby County, Ky
Top

Postby Richie O » Wed Nov 25, 2009 1:34 pm

KTA wrote:P-pumps run higher injection pressures and rates than a VE. Cummins went from a 4x.012 to a 6x.009 to reduce emissions while making the same power. It costs more to make a 6 hole than a 5, and thanks to higher pressure fewer holes is needed so they switched to a 5 hole for the p-pumps. There are many factors that go into optimum hole size, spray angle, and hole number. These factors are fuel quantitiy, injection time, injection rate, swirl, combustion chamber design, atomization, fuel viscosity, charge density, and a few others.



So KTA, the question of the day is : Are the spray angles the same between a 91.5 through 93 truck and the 94 up p pump? Also is the non cooled trucks different than all of the above?
1989 W250 727, 3.07 L/S, S300, P/S Intercooler, Stans exaust, Pump adjustments, 127k miles,297 hp
1993 W250 extended cab, rag, 4.10 l/s, 6x16's, HTT 62/71/14 piston l/p, Isspro EV series tach, fuel pressure, boost, oil pres, water temp, volt, pryo, 132k/ 301 hp
1992 W250 with NV4500, 3.54's, 16cm 60mm GDS H1C, ground stock cone, Isspro tach, pryo, boost, fuel pressure, slow, rusty, dented,180k
User avatar
Richie O
Administrator
 
Posts: 4171
Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 9:01 pm
Location: New England
Top

Postby KTA » Wed Nov 25, 2009 8:37 pm

I have sets of each so I will have to take them apart and check to verify for sure. At one time I knew for sure off the top of my head, but I believe they are all 145deg on 1st gens despite the hole size and number diffrence. I will try to hunt them down tomorrow in the garage and look.
Fleet of Junk: 1989 D350 627rwhp 1300 tq B-1/Hx60 twins, KTA pump/injectors, ported head, BIG fuel supply. 13.75@ 109.5mph 1/4: 1992 W350 Cab-chasis, 1993 W350 ext cab cust.370 inj Hx40/16cm 290rwhp hydroboost brakes,1984 D350 crew-cab another project.
User avatar
KTA
diesel guru/mod
 
Posts: 1855
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 2:23 pm
Location: Shelby County, Ky
Top

Postby Ace » Thu Nov 26, 2009 10:06 am

ford69557ci wrote:On a lower flow lower pop pressure pump a 6 hole stick will burn cleaner than a 5 hole stick of the same flow rate.

IOW, all other things being equal, more smaller holes will create better atomization than fewer larger holes.
User avatar
Ace
14mm rotor
 
Posts: 1024
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 2:10 am
Location: CO
Top

Next

Return to The good stuff

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests

cron